Monthly Archives: August 2008

No surprise Del Potro’s doing well

Today’s the opening of the US Open–one of my four well-documented two-week periods of the year that I sit on the couch, wearing my board shorts and cheering on Rafa.

I was hearing some buzz about Juan Martin Del Potro earlier today, and how he’s actually got the best record coming into the tournament (4 tournament wins in a row).  Amy asked what “del potro” meant, so we looked it up.  It translates to “of the colt”.

Which explains everything.

The 2004 movie Wimbledon chronicles the unlikely journey of a lower-ranked British tennis player (Paul Bettany) who makes an unlikely, and ultimately, successful bid and becomes Wimbledon champion (while falling in love with an American tennis star played by Kirsten Dunst, of course).

And what is Bettany’s character’s name, you ask?

Peter.  COLT.

If there is going to be a spoiler, especially with the jet lag that Nadal, Federer, and Djokovich are feeling right now, I’d might be tempted to put a bit o’ dough on Juan Martin.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Oh yes.

He’s using his squeaky toy as a pillow.

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Baseball out: for good reason

James and I caught the USA / Japan baseball game in the last round of Olympic round-robin play this afternoon.  It was actually an evenly matched game–going into the 11th inning, it was still a shutout for both teams, allowing two and three hits, respectively.  And then, at the beginning of the 11th inning, the announcer says that the coach has decided on which two players to start at 1st and 2nd.

Huh?

Apparently, if it’s a tie going into the 11th inning, no matter if it’s 0-0 or 4-4 or whatever, the teams start the inning with runners on both first and second base in an effort to bring the game to a quick close.

I’m calling bullshit on that one.

Game ended with US winning; 4-2.

They do the same thing in softball.  This, combined with the “mercy rule”, leaves no tears that these sports won’t be around in 2012.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Reflections on Beijing

I watched Olympics most of the day yesterday. I get sucked in by the stories.  The triumphs.  Prime-time coverage started off with the women’s marathon.  Now in years past, I remember seeing the start of the marathon, then they’d cut away to other events taking place right then.  Not so this year.  They showed the entire marathon, all two hours, twenty six minutes, and forty-four seconds of it.  And I was glad they did.  It was a gorgeous course through Beijing.  At one point they were passing the Temple of Heaven.  Amy said to me, “you know, our country is a child compared to China.  To them we’re not even a teenager.  We’re a toddler running around saying mine! mine! mine!”

That’d certainly be in line with our foreign policy.

I watched in awe as the Romanian woman separated herself from the pack, the extra bounce she seemed to get in her steps as she entered the Bird’s Nest for the final lap around the track before crossing the finish line.

And I think I cried a little bit, watching how proud everyone was of her.

During the day yesterday there was a special piece on the two dudes from the US who went to China in 1971 to play ping-pong, and it truly was one of the events that opened the doors between China and the rest of the world.  Bob Costas concluded it by saying “even though it wasn’t an Olympic event, it was what these games are all about–sports and friendship before politics”.  That led directly into a rehash of the medal count with obvious triumph that the USA was out in front in terms of total medals.

Sometimes I think the media gets in the way of the spirit of the games, fostering our natural predisposition for national arrogance.  As John McCain said last night during the Rick Warren led “Forum on Faith” when asked what our country’s worst moral fault is, we have a tendency not to “serve a cause greater than [our] self interest.”  Is the Olympics, for us as a nation, just another way to flex our international power?  I don’t think the athletes think that–to me it is spawned by the media.

I watch not to see how many medals we have.  And what I’ll remember isn’t the total medal count.  I’ll remember Benjamin Boukpeti winning the first ever medal for Togo in kayaking.  I’ll remember Oussama Mellouli from Tunisia getting to gold medal in the 1500m Men’s Freestyle.  Richard Thompson of Trinidad and Tobago collapsing in joy on the track after getting the silver in the 100m dash, which was much more of a triumph than Bolt’s display of arrogance in his gold medal run, actually slowing down and starting to celebrate before he crossed the finish line.

But even the cynic in me who roots for the underdog at any time could help but anxiously await Michael Phelps’ race last night to see if he could win his eighth gold medal in these games.  I actually paused the TV to have a smoke before watching the race.  As I sat in my writing studio, a few minutes later from all around the neighborhood this chorus of cheers and yells rang out, all at once, across the dark summer sky.  We then went ahead and watched the race, and yelled ourselves in triumph watching the winning relay team.  I might have been a couple minutes late to the party, but that moment of audio triumph from across the neighborhood was worth it.

We are all here together, cheering for the same thing.

Thanks Michael Phelps.

Thanks Beijing.

I might not be a red, white, and blue wearer.  But at that moment I was incredibly proud to call Phelps, Piersol, Hansen, and Lezak fellow countrymen.

Game on.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

I guess I stirred the pot a bit, eh?

Just a note: I will not directly answer any negative comments towards me.  I do not find that practice constructive in any way.  But I did want to give some thoughts.

The one thing I find interesting about the negativity is that most of it came from my words being misunderstood–that I was saying a child was not a blessing.  That couldn’t be further from the truth.  I, personally, find it difficult to view a disease / syndrome / disability (all terms which have been put forth as commentors as the “correct” term for DS–all which have been negated by others) as a blessing.  But something that is not a blessing does not mean it’s a curse.  There’s a big area in the middle, in which exists the cards we have been dealt in life.  Some are positive, some are negative.  Sometimes what one sees as a positive can be viewed as a negative by others and vise versa. For me, my struggles with diseases and genetic stuff are just part of who I am–they are not the defining factors for who I am.

Diseases / syndromes / disabilities exist in that middle area, for me.  I don’t understand how anyone can view it as anything more positive than that.  As one person wrote: sometimes someone who has been diagnosed with cancer feels it’s as blessing because it gives them the opportunity to find out things about themselves they otherwise would not have.  So very true!  We are thankful for the character we find in ourselves which is sometimes spurred by an adverse situation.  But I do contend that the impetus is still less than positive.

I have been accused of hiding behind a blog and that I’d never have the courage to get up on stage and share my thoughts.  This couldn’t be further from the truth.  I make my living primarily as a touring musician and as a writer / performer of my own stories and essays.  In fact I just finished the run of my fourth solo show, which centered around the struggle I face being a gay Catholic.  This blog is often my sketchbook of words and thoughts–things that stick out in my mind when I read them, hear them, see them, experience them.  Being on the road so much it’s much easier than writing in notebooks which can get lost (and have), or in miscellaneous files on my laptop that could be gone if my laptop dies (it has).  Later, I’ll go back and take nuggets of ideas, either of my own or what people have said, and turn them into a presentable piece.  As I wrote the original post, the idea of a story concentrating on why I separate my own struggles with disease / syndrome / disability from the definition of my self was forming.  Now it has morphed into something else.  A story of how questioning one blogger’s string of three words turned into 36 hours (and counting) of personal attack by people I have never met, because I disagree with their vernacular.  And, in turn, how their negativity was a reaction to my own vernacular.  When, really, at the end of the day, the majority of the issue is a misunderstanding.

I’ve also been told in no uncertain terms that I have no right to talk about DS since I am not a parent of a child with DS, nor do I have it myself.  This is true.  But in my mind, you can substitute in any minority–be it racial, ethnic, sexual, medical, genetic–into what I said and I would still stand behind it.

There’s also something very lonely, I’d imagine, about feeling that the only people who have the right to talk about your situations or can understand in any way are the ones who are going through the exact same thing.  I do not know what it would be like to be called the “r” word, or to have my child called the “r” word.

But I know what it’s like to be called “gay”, “dyke”, “fag”, and a host of other less accepted terms when I reach for my partner’s hand on the street.

I know what it’s like to not understand sarcasm due to my Asperger’s.

I know what it’s like to be referred to as a “knuckle-dragging primate” by a woman I was in a relationship with for a few years (because it’s “funny”, she always said) because I had scoliosis surgery at 13 which prevented my torso from growing, but my arms and legs continued.

I know what it’s like to not be allowed to participate in swimming in 7th grade gym glass because I wore a back brace, and the teacher’s solution was to have me squeegee the pool deck and locker room so others wouldn’t slip–while the others were all still there.

I know what it’s like to be stripped-searched in a European airport because the metal rods in my back set off the metal detectors at airport security and language barriers prevented me from effectively communicating that the metal was in my back.

I know what it’s like to be pulled over by the cops on suspicion of drunk driving after one saw me begin puking after leaving a bar in the middle of the summer because I have an intolerance to heat due to Graves’ Disease, and there was absolutely no alcohol in my system.

There are many more, but I’ll add just one:

I know what it’s like to be misunderstood, personally attacked, and assumptions made about my attitudes, my IQ (which is higher than a shoe), and who I am as a person because of something I wrote, without any regard or questions as to where or how I may have formed my opinions.

Situations over which we have no control are the ones which define our character, more than anything else.  Those are some of the truest words I have heard.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

And a note to people leaving comments

I attempted to email all of you with a copy of the blog I just posted.  It would help if you left an actual email address as opposed to one which does not exist, as four of them were just returned to me as “unknown”.  We cannot continue a dialog, if you so choose, unless I can reach you.

Thanks!

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Thank you for increasing my blog traffic

So I’ve received a fair amount of hate comments in regards to my last blog post.  I want to reiterate points that may not have been clear in my last post.

As I wrote (with brackets for clarification):

The presence of a child is a blessing. Their life can, and does, enrich our own. But to in any way shape or form pretend that this [the disease DS] is a gift to both your child and your family? I don’t get it.

Children, with or without disabilites, are blessings in and of themselves and bring happiness and joy to those around them.  Where I take issue is with the sentence structure of the blog I quoted, which states that individuals and families are blessed with DS.  And I will continue to contend that you cannot view a disease as a blessing.

And for those who think that I might not have experience or personal knowledge in this subject:

One of my step-grandmother’s granddaughters has DS, is a gifted musician, a joy to be around, and an integral member of our family.

This summer I have been working with a non-profit organization which serves adult members with developmental disabilities and organized free theatre trips for members of the group as well as staff members.

I myself am on the autism spectrum (Aspergers).  I also developed the auto-immune disease Graves’ Disease as a teenager which I have now struggled with for half my life.  It has caused both heart and cognitive issues and limits what I can do.

My fascination as a writer is language.  The words which people choose to employ when talking about aspects of their life.  I do not attack (although I do find the act of sending Ben Stiller movies back to him a bit absurd).  I question.  And I question not only vernacular but now also the defensive attacks which I’ve received.

I do not know you.  You do not know me.  In the world that is public domain blogs, the only tools we have to define who we are is through the series of characters we string together.

So please, before you assume that I can’t possibly have any frame of reference for you and your situation because I view disability not as a blessing but rather as a simple fact of our life, take the time to read the words for what they are.

Let’s highlight two of my favorite comments now.

My comment is awaiting moderation eh ??? So that’s how you work ?? You spout off on on things you do nothave a clue about and then censor the responses ?? How very mature. If killing freedom of speech is the only way you can continue to be “king of your castle” then your castle is not worth having

My comments are moderated to avoid spam comments from machines and servers that are not actually readers.  I would never not post something that was a direct response to something I’ve written.

Now I would run out & see Tropic Thunder if it continually used the words “fag” & lesbo” throughout the movie. THAT would have me rolling MY eyes! How funny! Now there’s a community that could “defend itself”, huh?

Although I am gay, I would have written the exact same post that I feel they are overreacting if the subplot’s catchphrase was “never go full fag”.  And as stated in my previous post, once anything is on screen it negates the power to defend itself.  You can choose to not see it.  You can choose to view the movie and a) accept the joke for what it is or b) voice your complaints in a reasonable manner.  But any protest which garners as much public attention as the one that is currently waged against “Tropic Thunder” will only bolster marketing for the film itself.

I invite anyone to email me who would like to continue this discussion in a respectful manner.  But, really, the only difference I currently see is I will not go so far as to call a disease a gift from God.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Please stop making me roll my eyes at you

I have officially added “Garden of Eagan” to my blog checks. The author is now urging people to send back all of the Ben Stiller movies that she owns. Except she’s not sending back the only one that she owns, which is…wait for it…The Ringer, because it “was endorsed and supported by the National Special Olympics organization.”

Irony. I love it.

And then today’s post is regarding a video that she and her daughter will appear in that will be broadcast on the jumbotron in Times Square. Mad props, that’s awesome! Except for this sentence:

These funds are NOT for Angela and I, but for the National Down Syndrome Society, who helps new and existing families who have members blessed with DS.

I’m sorry, but there is nothing that will ever convince me that someone is “blessed” with a disability. Definitions of blessed:

1. consecrated; sacred; holy; sanctified: the Blessed Sacrament.
2. worthy of adoration, reverence, or worship: the Blessed Trinity.
3. divinely or supremely favored; fortunate: to be blessed with a strong, healthy body; blessed with an ability to find friends.
4. blissfully happy or contented.
5. Roman Catholic Church. beatified.
6. bringing happiness and thankfulness: the blessed assurance of a steady income.
7. Informal. damned: I’m blessed if I know.
8. Informal. (used as an intensifier): every blessed cent.

And complications of Downs’ Syndrome:

  • Heart defects. Approximately half of children with Down syndrome are born with some type of heart defect. These heart problems can be life-threatening and may require surgery in early infancy.
  • Leukemia. Young children with Down syndrome are more likely to develop leukemia than are children who don’t have Down syndrome.
  • Infectious diseases. Because of abnormalities in their immune systems, those with Down syndrome are much more susceptible to infectious diseases. For example, their risk of contracting pneumonia is much higher than that of others without this disorder.
  • Dementia. Later in life, people with Down syndrome have a greatly increased risk of dementia. Signs and symptoms of dementia often appear before age 40 in people with Down syndrome.
  • Other problems. Down syndrome may also be associated with a variety of other health conditions, including gastrointestinal blockage, thyroid problems, hearing loss and poor vision.

I don’t think that blessed and a disability of that magnitude can be used in the same sentence.

So why write it in that way? The presence of a child is a blessing. Their life can, and does, enrich our own. But to in any way shape or form pretend that this is a gift to both your child and your family? I don’t get it.

I have my own medical conditions that I deal with. They are not a blessing. Do they shape the course of my life and who I am? Of course. I believe that things happen for a reason. That fate does exist. But it doesn’t mean you view everything as a gift from God.

So, please, stop writing things that make me roll my eyes.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

I am the High Priestess

At least, according to my “what Tarot card are you?” quiz results. Full explanation after the jump. Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Tropic Thunder, I am so there

I just finished reading this article in regards to the Tropic Thunder controversy.  I should note that I haven’t seen the movie.  Planning on it, though.  Apparently, the underlying sub-plot regards a movie that Ben Stiller’s character made called Simple Jack, which destroyed his career.  And as he tries to regain his a-list status, the motto is “never go full retard”.

And the intellectually-disabled advocates are up in arms over it, calling for boycotts, better education to studio officials, a complete rewrite of the subplot, blocking the release of the movie.  But this is my favorite line from the article:

Mockery in any form, or for any purpose or directed at anyone, especially those least able to defend themselves, is neither funny nor acceptable.

That line made a bell of off in my head, but I dismissed it as a bad turn of phrase.  But then I flipped over to the Star Tribune review of the movie and saw this comment:

This movie disgusts me. Poking fun at a group of individuals who often cannot defend themselves is not funny.

And then this:

Any type of humor will always be offensive to some group.. but when it’s directed at a group that cannot defend themselves, it’s pathetic and shallow.

And then I flipped over to a blog entry that someone linked in the comments, and saw this:

Sometimes I just get tired of constantly having to defend my child against the people who are supposed to care.

What is going on with the righteous card and the similar vernacular that the intellectually-disabled community can’t defend themselves?  I don’t know what this is bugging me so much, but this seems to me to be a case of members of the majority speaking out on what they think is best for a group which has a voice that is often harder to be heard.

And it begs the question: who is, at the end of the day, offended?  The members of the intellectually-disabled community, or those caregivers and advocates?  When The Ringer (PG-13, as opposed to Thunder‘s R rating, thereby easier to see by younger kids) came out a few years ago, there was a lot of pre-buzz that it was offensive, but I don’t remember hearing about protests (and after a quick google scan, it seems like no one else can remember them, either).  What is more offensive: Johnny Knoxville pretending to be mentally-challenged so that he can win the Special Olympics to get himself out of debt, or Ben Stiller and crew, in an obvious lampoon of blockbuster Hollywood, lamenting the decision to play a mentally-challenged character to hopefully get an Oscar?

I should admit that I own The Ringer.  Definitely not a cinematic work of genius, but entertaining.  Is it because the Farrelly brothers worked with the Special Olympics in preparation for the movie that it escaped protests?  Is it because Knoxville learns his lesson in a heartwarming soap-box speech, rather than the Tropic Thunder boys repeating their catch-phrase as a warning?

Has anyone bothered to stop and think what members of the disabled community would think about it themselves?  I’m troubled by this “defend those who can’t defend themselves”.  Bullshit.  You’re selling the people you advocate short.  This sounds a lot like one of my favorite stories to come out of Britain this year–the Local Government Association encouraged people to stop using the term “brainstorm”, and instead use “thought showers”, because brainstorm was offensive to people with epilepsy.

And then the epileptic community heard about it.

And laughed, and said they weren’t actually offended.

I also don’t like the insinuation that this is the only group that can’t defend themselves from cinematic humor.  Hey, guess what?  Once something is in public domain, it doesn’t matter what group it’s directed at, whether they are, in your mind, able to defend themselves or not.  Asian-Americans couldn’t change Mickey Rooney’s portrayal of the Japanese neighbor in Breakfast At Tiffany’s.  The entire plot of I Now Pronounce you Chuck and Larry.  It’s on screen.  The images are on the film.  There’s no backtracking.

You have two choices.

Don’t see the movie.

See the movie and take the joke for what it’s worth.

You have a right to find it funny.  You have a right to be offended.  You have a right to voice your opinion.

But to boycott what is being heralded as one of the best satires of Hollywood for saying “retard” seventeen times?

I have no words.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized